01 / 03
Cryptographic Identity
Every agent has a unique, auditable identity. You know who (or what) authorized each action.
AI Trust Layer
Autonomous agents you can stake your reputation on. Cryptographic identity, constrained behavior, and transparent decision-making for enterprise operations.
_§ 01 Thesis
The problem with AI agents today isn't capability. It's trust.
You can't hand a procurement agent a budget and hope it doesn't hallucinate a vendor. You can't let a customer service bot make refund decisions without oversight. You can't deploy autonomous trading algorithms without knowing why they made each decision.
BRAVA Agents solves this with three principles:
01 / 03
Every agent has a unique, auditable identity. You know who (or what) authorized each action.
02 / 03
Agents operate within predefined boundaries. They can't exceed spending limits, access unauthorized data, or violate policies.
03 / 03
Every decision is recorded with reasoning. No black box. You can audit and explain every action.
Not AI hype. This is production-grade infrastructure for autonomous operations you can explain to regulators, auditors, and customers.
_§ 02 Capabilities
_§ 03 Deployments
Monitor cash positions, rebalance liquidity across wallets
Agent Capabilities
Safety: Spending limits, multi-sig for large transfers, all actions logged
Autonomously purchase recurring supplies (cloud credits, software licenses)
Agent Capabilities
Safety: Whitelist of approved vendors, spending caps, escalation rules
Continuously scan transactions for regulatory red flags
Agent Capabilities
Safety: Read-only access, no ability to block transactions (only alert)
Handle routine customer queries, escalate complex cases
Agent Capabilities
Safety: Can't issue refunds > €100, can't access PII beyond account ID
_§ 04 Layers
BRAVA Agents don't replace human judgment. They extend it. Agents handle routine, high-volume operations within strict boundaries. Humans focus on high-stakes decisions and strategy. Every agent action is cryptographically signed and recorded on-chain, so you always know what happened, who authorized it, and why.
Cryptographically signed · Chain-anchored · Auditable
_§ 05 Identity
Traditional software runs under a shared account (e.g., "admin" or "system"). When something goes wrong, it's hard to trace who (or what) was responsible.
BRAVA Agents use Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs). Each agent has a unique, cryptographic identity. Every action the agent takes is signed with its private key. The signature proves:
The agent's DID
The action taken
Timestamp
Reasoning recorded in metadata
This creates an immutable audit trail. Even if the agent is decommissioned, the historical record remains. Regulators, auditors, and internal compliance teams can verify every decision.
Credentials are cryptographically verifiable. No central authority needed.
_§ 06 Safety
01 / 04
02 / 04
03 / 04
04 / 04
Example: Procurement Agent
All constraints are configurable. You define the rules. Agents enforce them.
_§ 07 FAQ
Yes, but they're auditable mistakes. Every decision is logged with reasoning. If an agent made a bad call, you can see why it thought that was the right decision, adjust the policy, and prevent it from happening again.
Agents are constrained. Even if compromised, they can't exceed spending limits, access unauthorized data, or take actions outside their defined role. All actions are signed with the agent's private key, so a compromised agent's behavior would be immediately visible in the audit log.
Not strictly, but blockchain provides immutable logging and cryptographic proof of agent actions. Traditional databases can be edited or deleted. Blockchain records are permanent and tamper-evident, which is critical for compliance and trust.
Simple agents (monitoring, alerting) can be deployed in 2–3 weeks. Complex agents (procurement, trading) require more policy design and testing, typically 6–8 weeks.
Agent deployment starts at €20K (simple use case, single agent). Complex agent networks with custom policies range €50K–€200K. Ongoing operational costs depend on transaction volume and blockchain usage.
ENGAGEMENT MODELS
Senior-led engagements scoped to outcomes, not billable hours. Every project starts with understanding the problem before proposing a solution.
Single conversation
Complimentary
A working session to map your challenge against our experience. No proposal, no commitment. Just an honest read on whether we are the right fit.
Best for: early-stage thinking, vendor screening
4–6 weeks
€25K–€75K
A fixed-scope engagement to define your architecture, regulatory classification, and roadmap before committing to a full build.
Best for: defined initiative, pre-build clarity needed
4–8 months
€100K–€500K+
Full architecture, development, audit, and production deployment. Senior-led from day one through go-live. No handoffs.
Best for: green-lit projects ready to build
Also available: Advisory Retainer (€10K–€30K/month) for ongoing strategic input, and Architecture Review (€25K–€75K) for second-opinion work on existing systems.
LET'S TALK
Whether you have a clear project or just a strategic question, start here. We'll get back to you within 24 hours with an honest read on how we can help.